FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Hi Arciusazrael. Can you ask somethings from Harvey Smith.

    • Is there any chance that Callista Curnow will make an appeareance in any Dishonored franchise in the future.
    • Is Cecelia alright during the events of Dishonored 2.
    • Can you ask Harvey about Blake's Sister name he must know it. I didn't found her name, she is only called Blake's Sister, she can be in the flooded district.
    • Ask about the black market female name in the Aventa District.
      Loading editor
    • View all 12 replies
    • I'm disappointed at myself. But I also disappointed that no one ask any question about Dishonored lore at all. Well I guess the last game was released a while ago so the level of enthusiasm has already died down.

        Loading editor
    • Don't worry, we'll wait for it next time.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Pauolo was asking about the book and I offered my opinion on it, I was wondering if you had anything to add I may have forgotten or offer a different take on aspects of the book.

    Here's the discussion: https://dishonored.fandom.com/wiki/Thread:76109

      Loading editor
    • Hmm, this is the second time my comments disappear now. Anyway, I added a bit but you pretty much said what I would've.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Are you ever available for Live! Chat? And if so what would be good hours to try to chat with you?

    Personally, I'm CST (American Midwest) but my hours are crazy and not really a good indicator of the times I would be available to meet.

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • I got a message from Modiphius just now with another download for the game and the accompanying message:

      The seller has added the following message for this update:

      This update contains errata and corrections to the original digitial release. Please see the enclosed "edit notes and errata" file for a list of changes and a msg from the Dishonored team.

      Ugh, and just after I started adding info from the book. :/

        Loading editor
    • And I made a bunch of notes in the old file as well :(

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I understand what you were trying to accomplish with the Semblance page, but please don't start changing the way our subheaders are done.

    We try to give as exact an access to each part as we can and it makes it easier if someone is wanting to change something very specific.

    - Geist

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • Ugh, that explains it. The Bonecharms are one of my least favorite pages due to how bloody convoluted the whole thing is. I think there was some discussion and agreements made a while ago concerning the ins and outs of that page because the importance of bonecharms changed so much from D1 to D2. This resulted in it being given a pass on certain Manual of Style rules due to the overly complicated manner of the page.

      As I was never a fan of the article, my contributions were superficial at best so I never really paid much attention to what was being done.

        Loading editor
    • Yeah, I don't like how messy it is either. If you ask me, the lists of bonecharms really need to be separated into D1 and D2 pages, and the main page should only include lore/story-related information.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Stop adding incorrect categories!

    If you are uncertain what a particular category means, I suggest you ask an admin or other veteran editor before adding them willy-nilly to every page without consideration.

    Walkthroughs category is NOT to be added to Mission pages unless an actual walkthrough is Present which most of these pages do not have. Otherwise there'd be little point in having two categories meaning the exact same thing.

    Please cease this activity.

    - Geist

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • Hey! Just to clarify, I said "Please cease this activity." :P

      Joking aside, one of the most consistent errors that I commit is my failure to realize that tone and inflection are not as easily communicated across a silent medium such as print.

      For example, I always question the necessity of exclamation points, and then when I do use them in messages I second-guess myself as to whether they come off aggressive or not. Another thing I do is capitalize letters when trying to draw attention to something, but others merely take it as me shouting at them, which I'm honestly not trying to do... usually.

      As for the Overseer example, what I initially assumed explained my actions apparently failed to do so. I mean, even Pauolo understood my point but it still didn't seem to be satisfactorily clear enough until my final (exceedingly long) response.

      Arciusazrael wrote: You can simmply say "this is speculative and likely a gameplay device to help players distinguish important characters"

      Unfortunately, that's probably never gonna happen. I would like to say I'll try to do that, but that is not how I talk/communicate nor how I process my thoughts ahead of time, so it would basically be me lying - and I don't wish to be accused of that. Also, as I've stated, you're not the only person I have done this to, because there are some people who don't seem to get a clue unless every last iota is explained to them.

      As for you having a bad day, pssh, don't worry about; I completely understand. I had literally just woke up to something like 14+ alerts from various fandoms I had to check on, so you're fine. I slapped together my message as quick as I could to prevent more from being done in the hopes of preventing excessively counter-edits and 'undo's on my part. I don't like flooding the 'Recent Wiki Activity' log with such things from me as I think it looks overly aggressive or obsessive on my part.

      Anyway, as far as I am concerned we're still cool. I do realize that my oft-times abrupt persona can come across rough; I didn't acquire that aka of "Bad Cop" on my profile page for nothing. ;)

      Thanks again.

      - Geist

        Loading editor
    • Yup, as far as I'm concerned, we are cool as well. Btw, about the Overseer case, I did get what you mean, but as I said, I was triggered and my ego got better of me so...

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Death of the Outsider is a separate self-contained expansion for the Dishonored series, not DLC for Dishonored 2.

    I am not 100% sure, but some of your edits seem to indicate that you think it is. The only DLC that Dishonored 2 had was the Imperial Assassin's Pack. There were also some game updates, but they weren't really DLCs so to speak.

    Just a head's up. If I was mistaken, then my apologies.

    - Geist

      Loading editor
    • No, you're right. Somehow I kept thinking of it as a DLC bit it's indeed a stand-alone game.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I've uploaded one of those images for a test, but as you can see they're quite small:

    Ammo expl bullet is

    Should I upload the rest anyway? I might also miss the images for regular bullets, sleep darts and stinging bolts.

      Loading editor
    • That's too bad. I think they are too small to be anything of use. I was hoping for some images similar to those we have in D1's inventory. Right now, most D2 and DotO pages don't have a main photo similar to that style (some like Electrical Burst don't even have an image yet. Anyway, thanks for checking. Maybe I will try to get some close-up screenshots and edit with photoshop.

        Loading editor
    • I see what you mean. That's because D2 and DotO don't have a detailed inventory like the first game, so no need for such pictures in-game.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Stop with your edits on the references. I don't know what you're doing, but it's not "cleaning them up".

    - Geist

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • I see, thanks for the tip and explanation. I can fix the rest of my edits if you want.

        Loading editor
    • No problem.

      And yes, that's fine.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Please be sure to follow our rules for Image Sourcing found here as we require a bit more information than just the 'fair use' blurb on this wiki.

    For examples of how pics should be done:

    Here.

    Here.

    Thank you.

    - Geist

      Loading editor
  • Hey, thanks for all of your efforts and interest in the Dishonored universe and the wiki.

    I would be remiss though if I didn't clarify some minor rules:

    • please don't post links within the quotes at the top of the pages. This was a minor rule changed a while back and it is still in force today.
    • please do not post links to pages that haven't been created yet; this wiki is not in favor of broken/red links. It's okay if the page is going to be made say... within about ten minutes or so of when the link is made, but no more than about twenty minutes should be allowed without either a page devoted to the link, or that link being undone if you cannot add it in time.

    Sorry if this sounds like I am being harsh; such is not my intent. Each wiki is different and these are simply some of our (lesser known) rules.

    Thank you.

    - Geist

      Loading editor
    • Well-noted Geist. I will keep this in mind while editting :)

        Loading editor
    • Hey actually, I have a question about red links. It's a good practice and a wikia mechanism that auto-links red links when new article is created. If we don't use red links, we will have to go back to existing articles to add them. It's also a way to show editors that "we don't have this page yet, please create it". Is there any particular reason why we don't do this? If you say it's for aesthetic reason, it's fine, I just want to understand the reason behind it.

        Loading editor
    • A couple of reasons actually. Aesthetic is one, yes. 

      We also had a very strong push with a good deal of our regular editors to fix redirects, remove duplicate pages, fix red links, and adjust broken references. This was agreed upon by the majority of our most active members and the process just sorta stuck.

      Finally, other wikis seem to have these red links and they stay that way for while, even with the suggested idea being 'hey, we need this page made up'. It doesn't seem to press people to make them as well as it should, and with our wiki slowing considerably since D1 and D2, it just doesn't seem new pages get created all that often.

        Loading editor
    • Crystal clear, thanks for the explanation!

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+