Thread:Arciusazrael/@comment-16533050-20190221104943/@comment-732225-20190221141922

Hey, I'm sorry for being agressive, I had a rough day today - but that's no excuse though. But I just want to say that it's not about how long or how detailed your responses are, you can have effective communications without using many words. In the Overseer case for example, you basically said "You're wrong" without any explanation, which I admit, triggered me a little bit, leading to a prolonged disussion. You can simmply say "this is speculative and likely a gameplay device to help players distinguish important characters", and I'd have been totally fine with that. Or in this case I feel like you use words that are quite heavy such as "without consideration" or "cease this activity", which might sound accusational. You know, you can just explain that the Walkthrough CAT only contains pages with walkthrough videos and ask me to fix my mistakes, I'd be happy to do so.

Sorry if you think this is trivial but I believe communication is very important, especially in a place where people never have face-to-face conversations.

I understand now that's the way you communicate and will also try not to take it personal. But I hope you can extend your considerations not just to me but to other editors as well, especially new people.