Thread:MDGeistMD02/@comment-29664475-20161210062248/@comment-29664475-20161210070840

Assumption, conjecture, speculation – all perspective-based, or as the MoS puts it, "interpretations" rather than factual and confirmed. Established rules in MoS > badass head wiki lady, I'd say (ok, maybe  ).

I believe in discussing matters and compromising, obviously, as I did with you in chat about the subjective Delilah headquote matter, so long as said discussion is warranted. I'm afraid that I won't be discussing in-full every little undo I execute. I additionally don't see why I must initiate these things, especially when in both cases, you had no objective evidence to the contrary.

The Bone Charms edit was "pushed through" to comply with the format of the "spring razor"/"springrazor" stylistic difference on Spring Razor – as I explicitly stated in my edit summary – for the sake of consistency. I say pushed through in quotes because it wasn't "pushed through" at all; in fact, it was a change that I made with my first edit to the page. But rather than simply remove "in Dishonored 2" (which I agreed was incorrect to add on my part), you removed the ENTIRE reformatting in the lead. So, naturally, I re-added that specific part, once again, for the sake of consistency and due to "also called" still being unnecessary. Additionally, when re-adding your "assumption", you re-added a gallery header space, which I thought we both agreed were unnecessary, so naturally, I had to go back not only to remove your "assumption", but the additional spacing you re-added too.

If you somehow feel antagonized when your edits are undone, I can at least assure you that I personally am not intending to do so. I simply undo poor revisions made by anyone, including myself (and I make plenty of 'em). However, if this is going to be a reoccurring problem with you, I can't promise I'll always be inclined to write walls of text like this to "compromise" unnecessarily.