User blog comment:PikovajaDama/Creating new pages/@comment-26007095-20160625215504

I'm also a fan of pages like Businesses and Streets of Dunwall. There simply isn't enough information on most of the things there to make interesting articles on their own but in the cases where there is, they can still be given their own pages that are linked to from the collection page. For example Greaves Lightning Oil or John Clavering Boulevard.

But there are definitely cases that warrant their own page despite lacking information as well. In my opinion, it comes down to whether or not it could be easily incorporated into a larger page. The Parliament Street Cutters are a good example of this, where would we put this if not on its own page?

In a way, I feel the same goes for the numerous tiny city pages we have. Many of them are pitiable on their own, with nothing more than a location listed, but many also have small bits of trivia. I don't see an elegant way of incorporating the varying levels of information into the main article and so I feel it's fair that they stay, even if some consist of only a sentence.

I also like Piko's suggestion on being a bit gentler if someone does create a page that belongs in a collection page. If someone has taken the time and effort to make a contribution to the wiki then we, as the established community, should assume good faith and do our best to guide the person rather than jump to scolding them. Assuming it's not a blatantly bad edit of course.