User blog comment:Unrulyruby100/Character category and potential category change/@comment-16533050-20140212080918/@comment-1500935-20140212164359

I'm not sure to understand what you call a desire to purge things, so I'll pass on this.

As I said, Character Classes can be moved into Allies/Enemies/Neutrals to ease categorizing, as those classes can be easily attributed to any of those three status. There will still be some exceptions, but I trust discussions are not one-sided on the wiki for such matters. By easiest solution I meant on an half-serious note the one that would demand less to no debate. Sorry that you took that badly.

Then, I was only suggesting removing the minor characters category yet again to ease things. However I understand it should be kept as a criteria on a character's involvement in the game's plot. That said, it can be interesting to discuss to which degree a character can be described as major or minor, as I don't believe characters like Geoff Curnow had enough impact on the general plot (the Loyalist Conspiration), apart from a reward if he was kept alive. Slackjaw would be something in the middle since he helps neutralizing two targets. Granny Rags is also an important character, but her involvement does not change the plot at all except for making a detour through the sewers. So yes, judgment again is the key here.

Finally, I will stay on the thought that categorizing by gender has too few interest compared to other criteria. Still if you do judge it important enough I won't bring that up again.

Just on a quick note, do the Propaganda Officer page only refer to the male one only or in general? In the latter it should be best to add the page to Female Characters as well.