Thread:MDGeistMD02/@comment-29664475-20161210062248/@comment-16533050-20161210083201

Since you wish to call up rules, how about this from the Rules of Conduct:

"No edit warring. If you and another editor disagree, discuss it in the comments."

We disagreed on a point, and following the RULES, I suggested we discuss this. You chose not to, and decided to change the edit anyway without discussing it. To use another of your expressions, in my opinion: Rules of Conduct > Manual of Style.

As I stated above, we probably would have agreed, but you chose not to respond, because in your mind, it didn't warrant the effort of you responding. However, the edit did warrant enough effort on your part to change it twice.

As to the Bone Charm edit, you claim this to be in compliance with how it is done on the Spring Razor page. Where exactly in the Manual of Style does it say that the Spring Razor example is correct? Perhaps it is wrong, and that article should be changed to the way the Bone Charms page was, instead of the other way around.

Again, instead of asking or discussing anything, you chose to do what you wanted. That shows little respect for your fellow editors, especially for those who called for discussions but are summarily ignored.

Finally, as much as I correct the formatting on the articles here, I was not trying to re-add the extra space on the Bone Charm page; that was an accident on my part. I'm not sure how that can be interpreted in any other way nor why you chose to even bring that up, especially seeing as how I'm probably the one doing the most to obliterate such occurrences of the wiki.