Talk:Bloodflies/@comment-29344802-20161118081419/@comment-29344802-20161119082111

Most of what you're saying relies on the assumption that I was saying the babies would be nestkeepers. Look, just because I don't refer to or say something directly, doesn't mean I haven't factored it in.

The babies would still be (relatively) human. Most likely they would have an attunement to bloodfly honey, and would be guaranteed to be suitable nestkeeper hosts.

The urge to reproduce is a heavily imbedded function, and takes little to no higher thought.

Babies are fragile, but they can still survive with little care as long as basic needs are met. As long as some survive to grow to around a certain age, their protective purposes are met.

You seem to be relying on 'common sense'.

Please keep in mind that there is a reason we refer to experts.