Talk:Wyman/@comment-25294282-20170727201743/@comment-5607198-20170815031059

" Where do you get off telling other people to watch it and to do so in such a hostile manner?"

Check my page, and I think you'll find EXACTLY where i get the idea that I can and should tell people to shape up their behavior.

Now, I read a hostility into your statement that you may not have intended, and I apologize if I mischaracterized you.

But if you are wrong, you WILL be corrected. I am proud to say that this wiki is very particular about facts, and we have rigorously explored the series for as much information as possible. I myself have been corrected many a time when I recall somethign incorrectly, or make a mistake while entering data.

And much of what you said was wrong.

@geist, sketchfoot didnt make an argument that was widely accepted, just that we have examples of LGBT characters and relationships, and that their presence means its entirely possible that wyman is a woman.

Either way, the importance of wyman is that they are part of Emily's background data. Thats why the gender doesnt MATTER, until wyman themselves matters.

Until then, we are all agreed: Wyman is essentially useless except as fluff text