Talk:Dishonored 2/@comment-4807396-20150621191235/@comment-5607198-20150628070814

To everyone saying Gameinformer is a source to assume the veracity of information contained therein:

Gameinformer's article on GUN, years back, included a different intro for the game and the mention of scalping being given a reward to encourage players to do it. Scalping had no reward and just wasted time/money, and the intro was changed to the one now present.

Their entry on Darkwatch also contained a differing backstory/intro/plot for the game than was delivered.

More recently, Bioshock. Bioshock recieved a cover appearance and a huge article in Gameinformer's pages. And the Bioshock they told us about is almost wholly different from the bioshock we got.

My point is, up until the day we get the game, ANYTHING said can prove to be untrue.

I WISH I had gotten the advertised Darkwatch and Bioshock instead of the ones that came out (though at least BIoshock was GOOD), but instead, the developers changed horses midstream and we were given VERY different experiences than we were promised