Thread:Metworst/@comment-16241899-20170122214530/@comment-16533050-20170123055914

I usually trust at least the title of a new article to be added correctly, and will admit that is probably the LAST thing I look at.

That aside, I think one of the problems with the articles at that time was not only the amount of new pages being added but the amount of normal user contributions going on at a daily rate were very heavy.

Looking at just one editor's activity on November 30 to December 1 for example (the date during which the Handbook For New Miners article was added and I made my first edit on said page) 74 edits were done.

Seventy-four.

Again, that's by just ONE person. And that person didn't even create that page.

As I said, I usually overlook the title of an article and focus more on the "meat" as it were. During heavily flooded periods like that, it does become difficult. Of course, this is just common sense. As is evidenced nearly daily, a lot of things get overlooked by nearly everyone, which is the reason so many contributors do follow ups.