Talk:Paolo/@comment-26199726-20190309194707/@comment-16533050-20190309235720

Usually when I use "repeatedly", I mean over and over again/constantly/numerous times - as that is its definition. Since I only found the two instances, I wanted to be sure I wasn't missing any or that there was wording of a certain way that you were interpreting as an alternate form of this idea.

As for multiple appearances of similar concepts, I can see at least three that can be combined into either one trivia point, or one trivia point with one sub-point, thus eliminating excess.

As for reading the quoted part, it should be remembered that a large percentage of our contributors and community are non-native speakers. What may make sense to you and I may not be so clear to them and the reverse can also be true.

That aside, I delved into the history of the article and it seems that in its original iteration, the trivia point read: "If both Paolo and Liam Byrne are left alone, in the low chaos ending, the two can be seen working together along with the Duke's body double Armando." with the part about Corvo being added later in a separate edit by a different editor.

This part: "Depending on the protagonist's choices, Paolo can become a member of the new Duke's or Corvo's grand council if he is spared in the Dust District." was also added after the original trivia point was made and seems to just be repeating information.

Since the repeated information did not read as incorrect at the time it was added and the game had only been out for a month at the time of the information's inclusion, the more active admin may not have suspected it to be false. There are, from my calculations and trying to take into account every available combination, some 150+ alternate outcomes for Dishonored 2; my supposition is the admin probably trusted the source enough to look no further into it.

Therefore, the original trivia point seems the most likely candidate to remain, with the year-later addition of Corvo being removed. Subsequently, the same information which was added under the main body of the article under the Dishonored 2 section can also be removed since it really adds nothing new to the information presented.

Is this what you had in mind?