Talk:The Outsider/@comment-32599355-20171230052354

This was a poor choice of a moral dilemma by Arkane. It only decides if the outsider dies or lives, it has absolutely no bearing on the fate of the world at large; Which has always been an important element of choice in Dishonored and especially considering that you are killing a god, your actions should have more consequences than the fate of a single man. The choice should have been kill him or walk away and allow him to remain a god. This is a much better moral decision because they are both bad options, which forces the player to think, and gives a deeper meaning to their decision. Like lurk said, and like it was hinted throughout, it might be extremely dangerous if nothing is regulating the void's power. Under the outsider, a handfull of people were given selective access to magic, which the overseers could at least attempt to fight against because the void's influence on the world is limited, and its power all personified and organised by a sentient being. Nobody could have access to the power of the void without the outsider giving it to them. Now the void is out of control and anybody with the right skills might be able to tap into its power without the need to be chosen and marked. With either ending, the world is put in huge danger, the player is the one causing it and they have no choice to avoid it.