Talk:Corvo Attano/@comment-26007095-20160717180156/@comment-16241899-20160717180722

I remember I've seen this before and I think it was poorer written back then. Maybe it got fixed up in the meantime. But then, it does have the GameInformer label on it which we have noted down as a reliable  source in our MoS.

Besides, except for what Corvo was supposedly doing during his time in the Guard, there is nothing there which we did not have there before.

What do the others think?

Edit: I'm pretty sure the article got edited later on, because there's criticism in the comment section (from you, Tea, among others), and there are things quoted in the comments that are not there anymore.