Thread:Essie Essex/@comment-27556523-20160110072159/@comment-27556523-20160110091749

PikovajaDama wrote: Not Essie either, but could you specify what you mean with mission titles in quotes?

As for the references: There is no harm per se in putting "The Heart:..." in front of the references or putting the full quote if quoting from a book... but I do find it highly unnecessary honestly...it is often stated within the article that the heart stated something, and the quotes link to the Heart Quotes page... Putting "The Heart:..." there seems redundant. For mission titles: "... in The Flooded District mission, I got wrecked", would instead be "in 'The Flooded District', I got wrecked". Having to mention 'mission' after every mission title, due to ones with names similar to other articles, is redudant when simply quoting them would suffice.

To your sentiment on references, it seems a fair point; I reckon I could see it being redundant, in the case of references from the Heart. Despite that, I'm still up for the overall : format.

MDGeistMD02 wrote: I think the reason we italicize the quotation marks is because that's how they appear with the Quote template at the top of the page(s). Therefore, it conforms. Eh, that's more or less part of the general format/issue as well. Quotation marks in the Quote template, in my opinion, don't warrant italicizing either.