Thread:MDGeistMD02/@comment-732225-20190104113041/@comment-16533050-20190105035401

Yes, I've noticed.

Honestly, that brings me to something I wanted to discuss with you. This edit here is an example.

I ask that you do not start rearranging words and phrases simply to comply with a preferred method of your own. We've had an incident like this before with another user that resulted in a temporary ban for unnecessary changes and the equivalent of badge-hunting. In fact the switching of the word "mission" that you did was one of the problems we had with this user.

As a wiki that has a broad spectrum community contributing to it, there will always be different levels of writing ability and preferred usage of terminology. Unless there is an occasion that warrants a change, the terminology should be left alone. If the change brings something more to the article, clarifies or makes a statement easier to read, or corrects improper information and grammar, then it's fine. Otherwise it should be left alone.

I'm hoping this concern will not become a problem with any of our current user base as I really don't want a repeat of 2017's issues.