Thread:Metworst/@comment-16241899-20170122214530/@comment-16533050-20170123172754

I would have to agree; the title within the article should follow the title rules and mimic the article's header.

There are (so far), 29 audiographs, 88 books, and 240 written notes found in Dishonored 2. I don't know how each presents their titles without checking, nor is there a reason to when we just have a blanket rule to follow. I would just follow the title rules throughout for several reasons:

First, newcomers to the wiki more than likely won't know exactly how each item's title is, the same as me. This prevents correcting unnecessary changes they may make.

Second, as is shown in the trivia section of the page Cleaning Instructions, parts of similar items get altered with newer updates/uploads. Who is to say that a dev isn't going to change/alter all of these in the near future or in a later edition?

I am not going to constantly monitor 359+ books, notes, and audiographs to see if or when their titles have been corrected. Again, the blanket ruling would prevent this.

Third, as I said I don't know which article titles follow the title rules or not. Someone could make screencaps I guess to prove whichever, but having a screencap solely for that purpose seems rather ridiculous, and would not be something I would want in the gallery. If the screencap is kept in the comments, it could eventually get "shoved down" or lost and would be a pain to refer to.

Also, as has been proved, notes and such do occasionally get altered. Should this be the case, the screencap is basically useless. This would again warrant a search of the 359+ articles on a regular basis which, as I said in point 1, wouldn't be necessary if we follow a blanket rule.

- Geist