Talk:Dunwall/@comment-74.102.81.185-20130224195045/@comment-5607198-20130227154206

Ok. Let's go point by point, so we can't have any misunderstanding

"I didn't shout out it is based entirely on Earth, I know this game has its own bloody timeline. -_- " you phrased your response in such a way that it was easily taken wrong. What you meant was "the game most closely resembles the 1800's", but by saying "in our 1800s" it seems as if you mean to imply the other.

"Also, it is based off of Edinburgh," AND LONDON "and how can it be based off of the 1600s when every bloody building is Victorian?" the CITY, the scenario, and the activities in which it finds itself engaged are based on the 1600s. the STYLING is based on the victorian era. "You do know the difference between the 1600s and the Victorian Era?" Why yes, yes I do. Do you know the difference between research and blurting out a response?

"Victorian Tech is not what is thrown in." Victorian design (technology) and machinery (technology) are thrown into a 1600's london (with some edinburg, yes). This is not debatable. This is in fact part of the released promotional statements. "The idea of Steampunk revolves around Victorian fashion and architecture with added machinery and developments. Technology is thrown in, the Victorians never dreamed of steel messes and shining whale oil that is as volatile as TNT." Here, you've defeated your own point. On the other hand, this is not a steampunk game. I can see why you and others can be confused on this point, because it does meet some of the superficial markers for the genre, but it isn't. Furthermore, upon rereading the post to which you responded, you'll notice i said "victorian", conveying the similarity to victorian style and technology, though it is indeed separate.